<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Veeam: What&#8217;s new in Veeam Backup &#038; Replication v11 &#8211; Linux Proxies &#8211; DirectNFS	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://jorgedelacruz.uk/2021/03/31/veeam-whats-new-in-veeam-backup-replication-v11-linux-proxies-directnfs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://jorgedelacruz.uk/2021/03/31/veeam-whats-new-in-veeam-backup-replication-v11-linux-proxies-directnfs/</link>
	<description>Everything about VMware, Veeam, InfluxData, Grafana, Zimbra, etc.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 16 May 2021 01:11:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: jorgeuk		</title>
		<link>https://jorgedelacruz.uk/2021/03/31/veeam-whats-new-in-veeam-backup-replication-v11-linux-proxies-directnfs/#comment-1415</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jorgeuk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 May 2021 01:11:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://jorgedelacruz.uk/?p=2870#comment-1415</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://jorgedelacruz.uk/2021/03/31/veeam-whats-new-in-veeam-backup-replication-v11-linux-proxies-directnfs/#comment-1412&quot;&gt;Jimmy McMoo&lt;/a&gt;.

Well, that specific VM comes from a 7.2K SATA QNAP NFS, going to a Linux backup repo, on another 7K SATA on an ESXi. But yes, usually DirectNFS backups should be faster than other transports, same as DirectSAN, maybe same or a bit slower on some cases when everything is 10GbE.

I do not have better hardware to try with proper NFS on faster disks. If you try it, share your results, please.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://jorgedelacruz.uk/2021/03/31/veeam-whats-new-in-veeam-backup-replication-v11-linux-proxies-directnfs/#comment-1412">Jimmy McMoo</a>.</p>
<p>Well, that specific VM comes from a 7.2K SATA QNAP NFS, going to a Linux backup repo, on another 7K SATA on an ESXi. But yes, usually DirectNFS backups should be faster than other transports, same as DirectSAN, maybe same or a bit slower on some cases when everything is 10GbE.</p>
<p>I do not have better hardware to try with proper NFS on faster disks. If you try it, share your results, please.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jimmy McMoo		</title>
		<link>https://jorgedelacruz.uk/2021/03/31/veeam-whats-new-in-veeam-backup-replication-v11-linux-proxies-directnfs/#comment-1412</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jimmy McMoo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 May 2021 06:49:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://jorgedelacruz.uk/?p=2870#comment-1412</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Fast? Hardly... 69MB/sec? Is your storage connected by gigabit links? Not even a very good test backup since it looks like an incremental and only actually transferred 300mb over the network.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fast? Hardly&#8230; 69MB/sec? Is your storage connected by gigabit links? Not even a very good test backup since it looks like an incremental and only actually transferred 300mb over the network.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 
Lazy Loading (feed)

Served from: jorgedelacruz.uk @ 2026-04-17 03:06:37 by W3 Total Cache
-->